
Katharine Susannah Prichard the lavender girl, 1915. A photo from a profile by Sumner Locke in Everylady’s Journal.
I sent my manuscript off two weeks ago. The publisher I think would be best for my biography now runs an annual competition for an unpublished manuscript, so it seemed a perfect goal. I’m catching my breath after eight intense months in which I wrote half of the book. (The first half took more than two years.)
It was failure which spurred me on: two literary disappointments on one day in November last year. The novel I’ve been working on for years, The Remains, was turned down tersely by a publisher I thought I had a good chance with. Then I found out an excerpt from my biography hadn’t been placed in one of the few biography-specific literary competitions. Some people take a scatter-gun approach to submissions and entries, but I work the opposite way – a small number of targeted, well-prepared attempts. My two big hopes for 2016 hadn’t come off.
Rather than sink more time into the novel, I decided I was going to put everything I could into finishing book one of my biography and having it ready for this other competition, closing 1 August. One chapter a month, that’s all it would take! I had to turn down a lot of other opportunities and neglect friends and family but I also loved being so focused on the book, doing so much writing. The rhythm was just right for me. A couple of weeks of further research for the time period in question, starting with KSP’s account in her autobiography, Child of the Hurricane, followed by collating all archival sources for that time frame, then a close search of Trove’s newspapers, and through it all, background historical and literary reading. And then a couple of weeks of writing. (Or in fact, a messier process than that, writing paragraphs as I researched, but somehow a chapter forming in time each month.)
Three years ago, I started the biography worried I wouldn’t have enough source material, because that’s what everyone warned me about – apparently it was why no-one had written a biography of Katharine Susannah Prichard in forty years. It meant I spent a long time finding obscure and tangential source material for the early chapters. Yet there’s more than enough material for a comprehensive biography of KSP, especially in the age of Trove’s digitised newspapers. By the end, I was realising how selective I needed to be; there were many small aspects of KSP’s life which could not fit even into a 100k word biography of her early life. I’ve also come to realise that biographies are never perfect – there is always one more source you could track down and check if you had unlimited time and resources. Given a month in the archives of London, for example, perhaps I could have unearthed more information about Katharine’s time there. But it comes down to how much time and money you can spend. And how much detail your subject warrants; James Shapiro has written two books on single years of Shakespeare’s life.
I’m somewhat lost now I’m not working to my deadline. It seems I’ve forgotten how to blog; I’ve been stuck on this post for a week. There’s a lot of non-writing things I need to catch up on. But I’m also eager to keep going with book two, covering KSP’s marriage. And yet I also want to hear back about the existing manuscript first. I am far from sick of KSP yet – I’m just getting warmed up for the rest of the journey.
PS: I am so grateful I’ve got an understanding wife, Nicole, and two excellent supervisors, Tony and Van, who have helped me get this far. Also, Thomas, now two, who makes me value time more than ever before.
Congrats on getting to this point! Having completed the manuscript in such a focused manner is impressive. It will find a publisher, and you will find ways to fill your “free time”, I’m sure.
LikeLike
Thanks Laura! Keen to hear news about your progress too – I shall be in touch.
LikeLike
Oh Nathan, how exciting! I don’t think I need to have my fingers crossed for you, surely your chosen target realises that a bio of KSP is long overdue.
PS Do not call a terse rejection a failure. I have no idea whether your novel is any good or not, but I do know that plenty of terrific novels get rejected over and over again before they see the light of day. A rejection is not a failure, it is a step along the way, sometimes even a necessary rejection that enables you to reassess it and make it better.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the encouragement and crossed fingers, Lisa. I have since got some helpful feedback on the novel and a clear diagnosis has emerged (deepening one character; fleshing out the prose) but I just don’t know if I can bear to sink any more time into it, knowing the long odds around getting a novel published. Have to see.
LikeLike
Congratulations Nathan this is great, and like Lisa says above, don’t take a rejection as a measure of failure ever. It’s just that person saying no at that time. All published writers have a long list of rejections of some form. And also what Lisa says, rejection is opportunity, to make the thing better and find a right home for it. All the best!
LikeLike
Thanks Jenny. In this case it proved a good spur, if nothing else!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, I’m ready to put my pre-order in!
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s a vote of confidence!
LikeLike
Congratulations Nathan. What a wonderful achievement! I totally understand the whole funk surrounding those rejections. We writers strive for such incredible highs and can come crashing down into valleys pretty easily. I had a week of ‘total devastation’ (or so you would have thought, given my emotional outbursts). Like you, my ships go out, navigating their way into the ports they are targeted for, so it sometimes feels like they’ve hit an iceberg and all my characters have drowned.
What a huge undertaking this biography must have been and I know many of us will be keeping fingers crossed as we will all be keen to read it. Congrats again.
LikeLike
Thanks Karenlee! Resilience is an essential attribute in a writer. Best wishes for your own work.
LikeLike
A phenomenal effort Nathan. I think this biography will be a landmark.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Many thanks for all your help, Tony. Your feedback and guidance has been so valuable.
LikeLike
Well done and congratulations Nathan. This is a wonderful achievement, and I wish you every success with the prize!
LikeLike
Thanks Michael!
LikeLike
All the best Nathan. I hope we see you in print (again) sooner rather than later. And I appreciate that you’ve stayed in touch during this intense effort as much as you have, blogging and commenting.
LikeLike
Thanks Bill – twould be nice to see it in print. Should be around on WordPress more for the rest of the year.
LikeLike
Good luck Nathan – and I’m super impressed that you managed a chapter per month. Maybe rather than rejected, we should all start using the word declined. There are lots of reasons a publisher might decline a book, many of them having nothing to do with the quality of said book.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Michelle. “Declined” does sound far less horrid!
LikeLike
Reblogged this on wrapped up in books: the home of guy salvidge and commented:
Great work, Nathan. Very impressed.
LikeLike
Thanks Guy!
LikeLike
What the others said about rejection! Take heed, Nathan. Not that it means you should keep at it if you don’t want to, but don’t let that put you off if you really love the story you are telling.
I’m sorry I’m late to this. I left the US to fly back to Australia on 3 August so missed this when it was posted. I’m still trying to get around to all the blog posts I missed.
I love the way you described working on Book 1. Your sense of energy and enjoyment in being able to get down to it came across well. I could understand exactly what you were feeling. Good luck with it. We need a good bio of her.
LikeLike
Thanks for the encouragement Sue. Rejection was a good motivator, although it remains to be seen what will become of the novel. How exciting to have had a trip the US!
LikeLike
Thanks Nathan. We love visiting the US. We lived there twice so it’s almost a second home to us – not that we’d ever actually make it home, but there’s a lot to enjoy there (as well as to criticise – but we can talk, can’t we?!)
LikeLike