I’m currently doing final revisions on my biography before I send it off for the first time. It’s 100,000 words long and twenty chapters – hopefully the first book of three covering Katharine Susannah Prichard’s life. I’m not certain of the title yet so maybe you can help me. Here’s a blurb for the book, to give you a sense of what the title needs to convey:
When Katharine Susannah Prichard’s father killed himself in 1907, her literary career was just starting to bloom. She was twenty-three, and she’d lived her life in the shadow of his depression, hoping for his approval. This biography is the story of Prichard’s restless early life as she overcame the deaths of her father and brother and many years of literary setbacks to break through as a novelist of the Australian land and people. It is also the story of her political transformation, as her quest for the answer to the world’s problems became urgent in the horrors of World War One and she decided that the only solution was revolution. All of it was tangled with her complicated love life, her long affair with an older man, a romance with a playboy activist that left her heartbroken, and finally her marriage to the Victoria Cross winner, Hugo Throssell. Precocious child, governess, journalist, and finally writer this is the engrossing story of one of Australia’s literary greats.
And the nominations for title are, in alphabetical order, with an explanation:
Astir: The Early Life of Katharine Susannah Prichard
“Astir” is a word which seems to capture the spirit of Katharine: “in a state of excited movement.” It’s not specific to any one strand of her life, but suggestive of them all. I was drawn to it by this passage from her, which I would use as an epigraph:
[S]o strenuously national is the spirit of today, so lively and vigorous the sense of our growing strength in intellectual and artistic life, that Australian literature is abandoning this “imitativeness,” these swaddling-clothes of its infancy, and adopting the toga virilis of originality. It has reached the adolescent stage—it is astir with great things; growing daily in power and freedom… But no-one has completely expressed the characteristic of our country, life and people. We await transfiguration at the hands of a great writer.
“Australian Literary Tendencies.” International 1, no. 3 (March 1908): 344–45.
Katharine Susannah Prichard: Before She Was Any of Those Things
This title comes from the prologue:
In Australia’s cultural memory, Katharine has become the aging, tenacious communist living in her cabin in the hills of Perth, widow of a Victoria Cross winner, author of Coonardoo. This biography is the story of Katharine before she was any of those things. If all of these things have antecedents, none of them were as inevitable as they now seem.
Katharine Susannah Prichard: Beginnings (or, Beginnings: A Biography of Katharine Susannah Prichard, 1883-1919)
This title speaks for itself! The plural is important, suggesting the different spheres of life.
A Rough Path: The Early Life of Katharine Susannah Prichard
In her grief over her brother killed in the war, Katharine wrote a poem called “For Alan”:
My way is like this way
Which goes through the hills—
A rough path—it seems to ascend, ascend:
But I know it will come to the sea,
And long day end.
It’s an image that conveys the pattern of her early life and would make a good epigraph.
Turning Red: The Early Life of Katharine Susannah Prichard
While politics was only one strand of Katharine’s life, it was an important strand and this title conveys the process of transformation.
If this book gets accepted by a publisher, I’m sure they’ll have an opinion on the title. But for the moment, I want to be sure the title captures the attention and respect of whoever is reading the manuscript. Please vote and tell me what you think. I’d also welcome other suggestions (leave a comment) and feedback on the subtitle (“The Early Life of Katharine Susannah Prichard”).
That was fun Nathan. I wonder though if this is to be the first of three whether it would be best to start the title with her name? I did like Astir. But, maybe Katharine Susannah Prichard: Beginnings (or The early years or some such) might be best. As you say, a publisher will have strong ideas! Good luck.
LikeLike
Thank you Sue! I have been brainstorming for the three, and have come up with what feels like a perfect title for number three. Was trying to make the other two fit that, but it felt a little like the tail wagging the dog.
LikeLike
I bet naming is both the most fun and the hardest. I look forward to hearing how it all pans out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I knew I was hopeless at this sort of thing, I’m the only one who chose Beginnings!
LikeLike
I only put up titles I liked – and that one was suggested by my supervisor, who knows what he’s talking about!
LikeLiked by 1 person
*chuckle*
LikeLike
Hi Nathan – I think Astir sounds like an abbreviation for A Stirrer, which if it doesnt fit is no good, and if it does, then is better than Astir. I think maybe an exact quote isnt the best best: I think a more approximate quote like “A Rough Ascent” is better than “A Rough Path”
LikeLike
Thank you Michael, valuable thoughts. “A Stirrer” wouldn’t quite fit this phase or really KSP at all, but is the right title for someone’s biography. Have to give some consideration to an approximate quote. Do you think a title should usually transmute the source quote, or particularly in this case? Quite like “A Rough Ascent” – plane ride / mountain climbing. She does go in a plane for the first time in 1917. And Guido Baracchi rubs in his affair with Lesbia Harford by saying how good she is at climbing hills in Emerald.
LikeLike
At first, I like ‘Astir’ but then the more I looked at the word, the less I liked it. I think ‘Beginnings’ is perfect, given there will be more to follow.
LikeLike
Thank you Karenlee. I couldn’t go too wrong with Beginnings – no-one can object to it. Interesting how evenly split the vote is so far!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Before she was any of those things is clever and memorable, so expect resistance. As a suggestion, The Life Times of the Notorious K.S.P. will probably sell more copies. If you are looking for a pseudonym, Beyonce is a good one 😉
LikeLike
She is at least nearly notorious, so maybe that could work! That pseudonym you suggest sounds a little familiar – I’ll check if it’s taken.
LikeLike
Publishers have changed every one of my book titles. If you want to have more control it might be worth devising all three and presenting them to the publisher as a coherent set. (I also like starting with her name).
LikeLike
Wise advice! Were you given the opportunity for negotiation?
LikeLike
Sort of. But it’s not a negotiation where you have power. The marketing people will win in the in end.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Truly I tell you, the marketing people shall have their way.
LikeLike
Exciting times Nathan – good luck!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just voted Astir (love it) but now having read the advice of Tim I agree wholeheartedly, do not look at the title in isolation but crucial to present as one of a set of three – to the publisher and to the voters. We need the options for the other two titles to inform our voting.
(As a librarian and working predominately as a cataloguer, may I humbly suggest KSP Vol I, KSP Vol II, KSP Vol III 😂😂😂)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes! Was thinking of “red” in all three titles as one option. Didn’t know you were mainly doing cataloguing now – good stuff! I like cataloguing, but no more than a quarter of my time, probably.
LikeLike
As a librarian/archivist who was often a cataloguer I hear you – and agree.
LikeLike
That wasn’t anonymous – was me! Jane B
LikeLiked by 1 person
Best of luck, Nathan. Am looking forward to reading your biography!
Denise
LikeLike
Dear Nathan
I do not agree with addressee of your manuscript and that is “whoever”
That is no one or anyone. If you are writing a letter, you have specific person in mind. You know that person’s face, like the back of your hand. That helps to address words on paper, not any words but lines specifically aimed at the heart of him/her.
The same is true for a biography, it is not different. It makes writing personal
Sincerely,
Marek
LikeLike