



It’s a year since The Red Witch: A Biography of Katharine Susannah Prichard came out.
I’ll always remember the night of my book launch at the UWA Tavern, my family and friends and colleagues and KSP fans gathered together. There were speeches from my supervisors, Tony Hughes d’Aeth and Van Ikin, who had been there with me all those years I was writing it. To my disbelief, Norman Jorgensen handed me a signed copy of KSP’s seven inch record on which she reads two of her short stories. It was such a generous gift. It was a surreal night – just before the event was due to start, I had a job offer over the phone which threw me off balance. I had been going to say no, because I couldn’t work full time, but in that evening when I’d finally climbed the mountain of the book it felt like everything was changing, opening up and that I needed to say yes.
That launch was the first of many events, a busy, giddy couple of months. I was even interviewed by Phillip Adams, something I’d long dreamed of. I’d been rather selfishly worried he would retire before the publication of my book. But it happened, an hour long special with me and Karen Throssell, KSP’s granddaughter. We pre-recorded in the morning but, alas, there was no cosy chat with Phillip before or after – he was in a hurry. The reviews started rolling in and there were so many of them! I was grateful to be met with astute and generous reviewers, some of them writers I admire greatly. I had an online launch, compered by Lisa Hill of ANZ Litlovers with Karen Throssell launching and my publisher, Nathan Hollier, also speaking. I had another launch at Katharine’s house itself in Greenmount, now the KSP Writers’ Centre, a place which had been so central to the journey. Fittingly, the centre’s patron, Glen Phillips, launched the book; he’s been writing about KSP for decades.You can see in the photographs the golden autumn light. It was a perfect afternoon.
As a bookend to the first launch, at the end of June the theological college where I’d worked for fourteen years had a combined farewell and launch for me and theologian Michael O’Neil spoke eloquently and appreciatively about my book.
I had a week off before I started my new job and a long list of things I was going to do but instead, I came down with covid and a severe case of a bad review. Since then I have been holding in a very juvenile desire to swear on my blog at the eminent historian Sheila Fitzpatrick. (Maybe an acrostic poem, Gwen Harwood style?) I’d always wanted to review for ABR and be reviewed in it. Professor Fitzpatrick’s review in the July issue came on day two of covid, when I was at my sickest. Confined to bed, I got up when I heard the postie. And there I was, finally in the ABR. Her review was disdainful and it seemed as if she didn’t understand the conventions of biography and what my biography was trying to do; she didn’t even consider it on its own terms. I’ve always been an outsider to the academy – I don’t come from an academic family and my work doesn’t fit neatly into a discipline – and I felt my eight years of research and writing were crushed by an insider who had all the power. But reviews should be honest and it was no doubt the honest opinion of an expert in Soviet history, an aspect of my book which isn’t its strong point – nor its focus. The thing is, it never looks good to respond to negative reviews. You end up looking thin-skinned and perhaps a little ridiculous. Of course, if I’m honest, I am thin-skinned and thereby temperamentally unsuited to the public exposure of publishing a book.
But other aspects of public exposure suit me. I love public speaking, love talking about my book and answering people’s questions. Due to the ongoing covid pandemic, I haven’t pushed hard to do more talks. I’m still wearing a n95 mask, trying to stave off repeat infections, and that’s something few people have sympathy with any more, let alone in a guest speaker. (If anyone is tolerating a masked speaker and can gather a few people to hear me talk about KSP, drop me a line!)
I wrote to a friend, ‘I had told myself that being published would be enough, but I think I had my fingers crossed.’ I thought there would be invitations to literary festivals (there was one – Mandurah, thank you!) and a shortlisting or two. But like most books, mine has largely missed out on these things.
A few years before I finished The Red Witch, a publisher told me that non-commercial Australian biographies sell between 200 and 1000 copies. It was a reality check and I was crestfallen. I read somewhere that David Marr’s biography of Patrick White sold 40,000 copies and there was a part of me setting that up as a benchmark. But here was this wise publisher recalibrating my expectations.
The thing about climbing a mountain is the dilemma of what to do next. ‘Climb another one’. A higher one? No chance. Or at least not right now. I’ve had two false starts on new books. Both foundered on the lack of rich archival material – personal letters – to bring the subjects alive. I’ve got two other ideas I’m spending a long time choosing between; both of them have promise and both of them have problems. I don’t want to commit to starting and then stop again. Also, I have no time. I do have an article celebrating Elizabeth Jolley’s centenary out next month in the State Library of NSW’s OpenBook magazine.
Thanks to everyone who has bought my book / read my book / come along to one of my talks / followed my blog – I appreciate it so much!
To celebrate the first birthday of The Red Witch, during May you can buy a signed copy directly from me at the discounted price of $45 with free postage (usually $10) to anywhere in Australia – the online shop is here.
You know, I never saw that review because I don’t get the ABR, and for good reasons. A recent nasty and inane review of Gregory Day’s very fine novel The Bell of the World makes me suspect that they use reviews of that type try to attract attention to a declining readership.
And what possessed them to commission a review from an historian of the Soviet Union, not someone with expertise in reviewing biography, much less literary biography?
Anyway, best to put that behind you and celebrate your achievement. Congratulations again!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Lisa! This week I’ve just got Gregory Day’s first album from 1989 on vinyl – his band was Untitled Red, it’s great.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If you squint you can see me in the picture of the UWA launch. How proud I am to have you as a mentor as an Emerging Writer. How vulnerable and powerful is this reflection about the ABR Review. We are Teflon for praise, Velcro for criticism. Write on Nathan!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hadn’t heard that one before, it’s so true! Thank you Pip, great to walk the writing journey with you.
LikeLike
Thanks Nathan.
<
div>Knowing a litt
LikeLike
Thanks Trevor – did some of your comment get truncated?
LikeLike
Nathan, I really enjoyed The Red Witch. I want to say more and will when I find the time, but for now – it was incredible to read the story of her life having visited that house and wondered what happened there in her lifetime. A real gift to WA’s writing community, thank you for those eight years of work (and please don’t be disheartened by one review, though I know how that feels.)
LikeLike
Thank you Zoe! I’d been meaning to write to you to tell you how much I enjoyed your biographical quest essay on Judith Kerr in Westerly – and also to thank you for the generous review on Good Reads, it was a real boost.
LikeLike
Thanks so much Nathan, glad you enjoyed it. We’re all out here reading away… it’s good to hear back! And huge congratulations on the Premier’s Award. Well deserved.
LikeLike
It was fun following the twists and turns of your path to publication, and now, beyond. I look forward to you blogging the writing of your next book.
LikeLike
Thank you Bill, appreciate your support along the way!
LikeLike
Ah Nathan, I feel your pain. What on earth possesses people to take fingers to keyboard and call it a way of life, eh? I am so pleased you basked in the warmth your hard work created. I have a thought about reviews – all publicity is good publicity. You won’t believe the number of people (going by FB posts on reading groups) who purchase a book based on someone else’s bad review! Anyway, you know you did a brilliant job, as do we, your fans.
LikeLike
Thank you Karenlee! You’re right – a Guardian journo said he read my book because of that bad review. I actually have sympathy with critics who say we have too cosy a relationship between reviewers and writers in Australia and we need more honest reviews… sounds true till it happens to me! But the other issue is fairness. Thanks for all your support!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Nathan, I read Sheila Fitzpatrick’s review in the ABR of your book and then I re-read your intro to your book where you state clearly that your ‘quest’ was to ‘tell a story of someone from their archival remains’ and that you wanted to write ‘about someone who had walked the same streets as me in Perth,’ something I reckon you’ve achieved in spades! In my opinion, Sheila Fitzpatrick is guilty of what I’ve always hated in reviews and criticism: i.e., instead of dealing with the book that was written, the critic/reviewer tells the author he/she should have taken a different approach. In your case, Fitzpatrick seems to have wanted you to write your bio from (1) an ASIO perspective or (2) a psychological perspective. As one of my wise old lecturers from UCLA used to say, ‘Give the writer his or her thesis and go from there.’ I agree with you — Sheila Fitzpatrick ‘didn’t consider it on its own terms’. Wouldn’t waste any more time worrying about that review!!!
LikeLike
Hi Again, Nathan, I forgot to sign off on my message to you about the ABR book review! Just thinking about it again, can you imagine writing a book about KSP from an ASIO perspective??? Yikes! Denise
LikeLike